Om Prakash v. Ram Shakhi Devi and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
An application was dismissed for default as no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press it, while the respondent's counsel was present.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.829 of 2018
======================================================
Om Prakash Son of Sri Janardan Singh, resident of Ward No- 10, Nagdah, Begusarai, PIN- 851117
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : NONE For the Respondent/s : Mr. Shekhar Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
6 05-09-2022 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press
this application. However, learned Counsel for the respondents is present.
Earlier also, on 22.08.2022, no one had appeared on
behalf of the petitioner to press this application.
This application is, accordingly, dismissed for default.
(Anil Kumar Sinha, J.)
Prabhakar Anand/-
U √
Om Prakash
Ram Shakhi Devi
Ram Kali Devi
Indu Devi
ANIL KUMAR SINHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court