Md. Tayyab @ Tayyab Khan @ Bholu v. Sana Fatima
Case brief
What is this about?
No one appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The civil miscellaneous application was dismissed due to non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.486 of 2018
======================================================
Md. Tayyab @ Tayyab Khan @ Bholu S/o Late Md. Ejaz @ Azad Khan, R/o Village-Chakiya, P.S.-Muffasil Ara, District-Bhojpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
Sana Fatima D/o Md. Safiruzamman and W/o Md. Tayyab @ Tayyab Khan, @ Bholu, Village-Chakiya, R/o of Village-Chakiya, P.S.-Muffasil Ara, District-Bhojpur.
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
5 14-09-2022 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner.
This civil miscellaneous application stands dismissed
due to non prosecution.
(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)
praful/-
U
Md. Tayyab @ Tayyab Khan @ Bholu
Sana Fatima
Anil Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court