The High Court at Patna dismissed miscellaneous appeal MA No. 331 of 2015. No one appeared on call. The court noted repeated lack of appearance and apprehended that the appellant had lost interest in the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Appeal No.331 of 2015
======================================================
Sheo Sah, Son of Budhan Sah, resident of village- Madhuban, P.S. Madhuban, District-East Champaran
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : None For the Respondent/s : None
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL ORDER
3 12-12-2022
No one appears on call.
On 14.11.2022, learned counsel for the appellant
submitted that the matter is very old and as such he would like to ascertain the present status of the case pending before the learned Additional District Judge-XIth, East Champaran at Motihari.
The present appeal was directed against the order dated 24.04.2015 passed by the learned Additional District Judge-XIth, East Champaran at Motihari in Probate Revocation Case No. 01 of 1984 by which the aforesaid petition was dismissed.
Patna High Court MA No.331 of 2015(3) dt.12-12-2022 2/2
It seems that the appellant has lost interest in the case as would reflect that on repeated call no one had come forward
to represent the case.
The M.A. No. 331 of 2015 stands dismissed.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
Jagdish/Neha/-
U
Sheo Sah
Srimati Chandri Devi
Shankar Choudhary
Subodh Choudhary
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
