Having heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the Insurance Company, so far as the question of calculation of taking Rs.6000/- per month as monthly income of the deceased is concerned, the Court is in agreement with the submission made by learned counsel for the Insurance Company. Further in calculating the average monthly income taking into account the income tax return for the last three years, the monthly income may go down even further. However not going into the details thereof, the monthly income with respect to the deceased is taken as Rs.6000/. Further in view of the judgment in the case of National Insurance Ltd. versus Pranay Sethi [(2017) 16 SCC 680], in case the deceased was self employed or on fixed salary an addition of 40% of the established income has been given as future prospects. The Court holds the deceased in the instant case also to be entitled to the same. Further on the question of multiplier, the Court once again finds substance in the submission made on behalf of Insurance Company that from the chart given in the case of Sarla Verma (surpa) for ascertaining the multiplier the relevant age would be the age of the deceased which is 30 years in the instant case and as such the correct multiplier would be 17 and
