The Patna High Court allowed the appellant insurance company to withdraw a miscellaneous appeal pursuant to a Lok Adalat compact. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn with no merits discussed.
Permission to withdraw the appeal as per Lok Adalat compromise; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Appeal No. 176 of 2018
======================================================
Branch Manager, Future Generali India Insurance Company Limited, 1st Floor, Harihar Chamber, Boring Road, Patna through its Assistant Manager (Legal-Claim) Shailesh Anand, s/o Mr. Shailendra Kumar, 3rd Floor, Anand Complex, Beside Lalpur Police Station, Lalpur, Ranchi-834001.
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Ms. Mayuri, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER
Mayuri, learned counsel who represent the Future Generali India Insurance Company Limited stating therein that the matter has been compromised in the list ‘Lok Adalat’ conducted on 12.11.2022 and as such the appellant company seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal.
Patna High Court MA No.176 of 2018(4) dt.06-12-2022 2/2
In view of the said slip which has been confirmed by
Ms. Mayuri who is representing the Insurance Company before
this Court, the same is allowed.
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
Prakash Narayan U
Branch Manager, Future Generali India Insurance Company Limited
Most. Sugandhi Devi
Arti Kumari
Murti Kumari
Manish Kumar
Nandani Kumari
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
