Chandra Kant Ray v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
The Patna High Court disposed of an oral order in a writ jurisdiction case due to the resignation of respondent No.6 mentioned in the counter affidavit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9914 of 2020
======================================================
Chandra Kant Ray
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vasant Vikas For the Respondent/s : Mr.Lalit Kishore ( Ag ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
5 29-08-2022 Heard the parties.
In view of the statement made in paragraph 4, 5 and 6
of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent No.6, this application is dispose off.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
shweta/-
U
Chandra Kant Ray
The State of Bihar
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court