In a civil writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the Court dismissed the matter as not pressed following the petitioner's counsel's application to withdraw the petition. The order contains no substantive findings or legal propositions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.981 of 2019
======================================================
Bipin Kumar Agarwal Son of Sri Vijay Kumar Agarwal, Resident of VillageP.O.-Harsidhi, P.S.-harsidhi, District-East Champaran, Motihari
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sharda Nand Mishra For the Respondent/s : Mr.Rishi Raj Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER
2 01-07-2019 The Ld. Counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw
the present petition.
Accordingly, the present writ petition stands
dismissed as not pressed.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
Tiwary/-
U
Bipin Kumar Agarwal
State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department
Mohit Kumar Shah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
