The High Court at Patna dismissed a civil writ petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear despite repeated calls, despite counsel appearing for one respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.893 of 2022
======================================================
Rajesh Kumar Tikmani, Son of Nand Kishor Tikmani, Resident of :- Brahman Toli, Road Near Durga Sthan, P.S. - Ahiyapur, District – Muzaffarpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Uday Prakash Shrarma For the Respondent/s : Mr.Yogendra Pd. Sinha (Aag7) For Respondent no. 4. : Mr. Anurag Saurav ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR)
3 22-11-2022
repeated calls.
Mr. Anurag Saurav, the learned counsel on behalf
of Muzzaffarpur Municipal Corporation, is present.
The writ petition stands dismissed for non
prosecution.
(Ashutosh Kumar, J)
Sunilkumar/Mathew U
( Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)
Rajesh Kumar Tikmani
The State of Bihar
The Principal Secretary Urban Development Housing Department, Govt. of Bihar
The Collector, Muzaffarpur
The Municipal Commissioner Municipal Corporation, Muzaffarpur
ASHUTOSH KUMAR
NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
