Oral order in a civil writ petition. The petitioner appeared unrepresented; no one showed up to defend the case. The judgment was dismissed due to the petitioner's default in absence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8640 of 2017
======================================================
Gopichand Prasad son of Hari Ram, resident of VillageP.O.- Hulasi Tola, P.S.Maner, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Satya Vrat, AC to GP-10 For the Accountant General: Mr. Kumar Priya Ranjan, Advocate Mr. Pallav, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
15 31-03-2022 No one appears for the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for
the Accountant General are present.
This case is dismissed for default.
(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)
S.Ali/-
U
Gopichand Prasad
State Of Bihar
Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj, Bihar
District Magistrate, Patna
District Panchayat Raj Officer, Patna
Block Development Officer, Dulhin Bazar
Anil Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
