Dismissed

Sanila Devi @ Shanila Devi v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC9 Nov 2022CWJC/8154/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking a FPO license on compassionate grounds. The Court found the application was filed two years after the husband's death and denied the relief, holding the authorities did not err in not granting a direction for issuance.

What did the court decide?

No direction granted to the authorities to issue a license on compassionate grounds; cost easy.

Sanila Devi @ Shanila Devi Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2022) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8154 of 2022

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Sanila Devi @ Shanila Devi wife of Late Ram Ayodhya Ram, resident of Village- Tarawan (Parsauni Dubey) P.O.- Tarawan, P.S., Block and CircleSahebganj, District- Muzaffarpur.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The District Magistrate-cum- Collector, District- Muzaffarpur.

¶8

The District Supply Officer, District- Muzaffarpur.

¶9

The Sub- Divisional Officer, West Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur.

¶10

The Block Development Officer, Block- Sahebganj, District- Muzaffarpur.

¶11

The Block Marketing/ Supply Officer, Block- Sahebganj, DistrictMuzaffarpur.

¶12

... ... Respondent/s

¶13

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Suraj Narayan Yadav, Advocate Mr. Upendra Kumar Chaubey, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Upendra Pratap Singh, AC to SC 4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY

¶14

ORAL ORDER

¶15

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR)

¶16

4 09-11-2022 Heard Mr. Suraj Narayan Yadav, learned

¶17

Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Upendra Pratap Singh for the State.

¶18

The request of the petitioner for being granted

¶19

license on compassionate ground because of the death

¶20

of her husband has not yet been decided upon.

¶21

Patna High Court CWJC No.8154 of 2022(4) dt.09-11-2022 2/2

¶22

However, from the counter affidavit, it appears that the application for grant of license on compassionate ground was filed by the petitioner after two years of the death of her husband and during the period when she was a member of the Panchayat Samiti.

¶23

In any view of the matter, the application ought not to have been kept pending and a decision should have been taken but considering the afore-noted set of facts, we are not inclined to accede to the request of the petitioner for issuance of any direction to the authorities

¶24

for granting license to the petitioner under compassionate ground.

¶25

The petition is accordingly dismissed.

¶26

Cost easy.

¶27

(Ashutosh Kumar, J)

¶28

( Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

¶29

krishna/-HR

¶30

Sanila Devi @ Shanila Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanila Devi @ Shanila Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahanth Bhubneshwar Bhagat @ Mahanth Bhuneshwar Bhagat Vs The State of Bihar

Kumar Gaurav Vs The State of Bihar

Yadunanadan Paswan, Vs The State of Bihar

Gulam Mustafa Vs The State of Bihar

Uday Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Nita Kumari Vs The State of Bihar