Dismissed

Rakesh Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC26 Aug 2022CWJC/7460/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking mandamus for the release of a tractor allegedly seized under the Indian Forest Act. The court directed authorities to dispose of the pending case and allowed the petitioner to apply for vehicle release within 10 days.

What did the court decide?

Direction to forest authorities to dispose of the case at earliest; liberty to move application for vehicle release on priority within 10 days.

Rakesh Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Property and Title | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7460 of 2022

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Rakesh Kumar Singh, aged about 33 years, (Male), Son of Ashok Prasad Singh, R/o Village - Narhan, P.S.- Bibhutipur, District- Samastipur.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Forest and Environment, Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Chief Conservator of Forest Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The District Magistrate, Samastipur.

¶9

The Divisional Forest Officer-cum-Authorized Officer, Samastipur, Forest Division, Samastipur.

¶10

The District Forest Officer Samastipur.

¶11

The Forestor, Bithan, Rosera Forest Circle, District - Samastipur.

¶12

... ... Respondent/s

¶13

====================================================== Appearance :

¶14

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mirityunjay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anant Pd. Singh, SC 15

¶15

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN

¶16

ORAL ORDER

¶17

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA)

¶18

2 26-08-2022 The matter has been heard via video conferencing.

¶19

The petitioner has prayed for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus to release his vehicle/tractor which was seized under Sections 33, 41, 42, 52 and 64 of the Indian Forest Act, 1917 and Bihar Amendment Act, 1990. According to the petitioner, no notice has been served on him till date. As a result, his vehicle is getting dilapidated in the premises of the forest official.

¶20

We have put a query to learned counsel for the

¶21

Patna High Court CWJC No.7460 of 2022(2) dt.26-08-2022 2/2

¶22

petitioner whether he shall appear before the concerned authority and present his case. He is agreeable to this proposal.

¶23

Under the circumstances, we dispose off the writ petition with a direction to the forest authorities to dispose off the case at the earliest. The petitioner shall also be at liberty to move an application for release of vehicle during the pendency of the proceedings which shall be dealt with on priority, in any case, not later than 10 days.

¶24

(Rajan Gupta, J)

¶25

(Dr. Anshuman, J)

¶26

P. Kumar

¶27

Rakesh Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rakesh Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. Vaibhav Goel Security Agency Vs The Union of India

Abu Lais Iqbal Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

The State of Bihar Vs Anant Kishore Jha

M/s Aman Ply and Saw Mill Vs The State of Bihar

Kamlesh Singh Vs The State of Bihar

M/s Janta Saw Mill Vs The State of Bihar