Disposed

Md. Raquimuddin v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC23 Aug 2022CWJC/6097/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition filed for outstanding retirement dues and pension on an alleged higher pay scale. The court noted that pension and benefits had already been calculated and paid on the correct revised pay scale based on the petitioner's entitlements, with rectification made. Liberty to agitate subsisting grievances was granted.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition stands disposed off. Liberty granted to the petitioner to agitate subsisting grievances, if any.

Md. Raquimuddin Vs The State of Bihar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6097 of 2020

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Md. Raquimuddin S/o Md. Abid Hussain Department of Establishment Sec. Bihar Agriculture College Compus Sabour District- Bhagalpur at present resident of Village at Purabi, Panasi, P.S.- Paharkatta, District- Kishanganj.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Finance, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Accountant General Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Vice- Chancellor Bihar Agriculture University Sabour, Bhagalpur.

¶9

The Director Administration Bihar Agriculture University Sabour, Bhagalpur.

¶10

The Comptroller Bihar Agriculture University Sabour, Bhagalpur.

¶11

Associate Dean- cum- Principal Bihar Agriculture College, Sabour, Bhagalpur.

¶12

The Assistant Director Administration Bihar Agriculture University Sabour, Bhagalpur.

¶13

The Assistant Comptroller (Fund) Bihar Agriculture University Sabour, Bhagalpur.

¶14

The Head Clerk Accounts Bihar Agriculture University Sabour, Bhagalpur.

¶15

The Officer Incharge Field Bihar Agriculture College Sabour, Bhagalpur.

¶16

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Firoz Ahmad, Advocate For the State : Mr.Dhurjati Kr. Prasad (GP-14) For the respondent Nos. 3-10: Dr. K.N. Singh, Sr. Advocate Mr. Shailendra Kr. Singh, Advocate Mr. Ram Krishna, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶17

6 23-08-2022

¶18

Though the present writ petition had been filed for payment of the outstanding retiral dues, as also for payment of the pension/gratuity etc. on the basis of last pay scale @ of Rs. 52000/- instead of Rs. 45400/- as also for fixation of retiral dues on the basis of 7^th pay scale but it is apparent from the counter

¶19

Patna High Court CWJC No.6097 of 2020(6) dt.23-08-2022 2/3

¶20

affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent nos. 3 to 10 that the petitioner has already been paid the entire amount of gratuity, pension/its arrears, leave encashment amount, group insurance amount and arrears of MACP. It has also been submitted in the said counter affidavit filed by the respondent nos. 3 to 10 that the petitioner was entitled to only two ACP, however, he was wrongly granted three ACP/MACP, however, the fact is that the petitioner had already been granted one promotion, hence he was/is entitled to only two ACP, thus, on this score, rectification was made and pension has been fixed on the corrected revised pay-scale. Though it is the stand of the respondent-University and to that effect the learned senior counsel Dr. K.N. Singh has submitted that the University does not propose to recover any excess amount paid to the petitioner, nonetheless, it is submitted that the entire benefits/pension has been calculated and is being paid on the basis of the correct revised pay scale and more over the pension has also been revised taking into account the revised 7^th pay scale.

¶21

In such view of the matter, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition may be disposed off, however, liberty be granted to the petitioner to agitate his subsisting grievances, if any. Liberty so sought is granted.

¶22

Patna High Court CWJC No.6097 of 2020(6) dt.23-08-2022 3/3

¶23

The writ petition stands disposed off.

¶24

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶25

S.Sb/-

¶26

Md. Raquimuddin v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Raquimuddin v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dom Matho alias Doma Mahto, Vs The State of Bihar

Mantu Ray alias Mantu Chandra Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Idris alias Md. Idrish Vs The State of Bihar

Rukhsana Shaheen Khan Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Indra Kala Devi Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Awadh Bihari Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.