Disposed

Mohammad Ajajul Haq v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC7 Jul 2022CWJC/6012/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order concerns a writ petition against an encroachment order. The court disposed of the petition granting liberty to file an appeal within four weeks. Status quo is maintained for four weeks, alongside liberty to seek interim orders from the appellate authority.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to file appeal within four weeks; status quo maintained for four weeks; liberty to move for interim orders.

Mohammad Ajajul Haq Vs The State of Bihar — Land Acquisition | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6012 of 2022

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Mohammad Ajajul Haq Son of Mohammad Hadish, Resident of Village and P.O. Bijayi, P.S. Ghorasahan, District-East Champaran at Motihari.

¶4

Nurul Hoda @ Bigu Son of Abdul Rahman Resident of Village and P.O. Bijayi, P.S. Ghorasahan, District-East Champaran at Motihari.

¶5

Md. Sherajul Haque Son of Md. Hadish Resident of Village and P.O. Bijayi, P.S. Ghorasahan, District-East Champaran at Motihari.

¶6

Isha Mohammad Son o f Abul Sattar Resident of Village and P.O. Bijayi, P.S. Ghorasahan, District-East Champaran at Motihari.

¶7

Md. Tabarak Son of Md. Hadish Resident of Village and P.O. Bijayi, P.S. Ghorasahan, District-East Champaran at Motihari.

¶8

Monazir Son of Jaki Ahmad Resident of Village and P.O. Bijayi, P.S. Ghorasahan, District-East Champaran at Motihari.

¶9

Safique Mansuri Son of Satayat Mansuri Resident of Village and P.O. Bijayi, P.S. Ghorasahan, District-East Champaran at Motihari.

¶10

Sheikh Umaish Son of Addul Sattar, Resident of Village and P.O. Bijayi, P.S. Ghorasahan, District-East Champaran at Motihari.

¶11

Iftkhar Son of Abdul Rahman Resident of Village and P.O. Bijayi, P.S. Ghorasahan, District-East Champaran at Motihari.

¶12

Md. Mansoor Alam Son of Mobark Resident of Village and P.O. Bijayi, P.S. Ghorasahan, District-East Champaran at Motihari.

¶13

Jafrulla Mian Son of Langtu Resident of Village and P.O. Bijayi, P.S. Ghorasahan, District-East Champaran at Motihari.

¶14

Samaruddin 45 Son of Gani Mohammad Resident of Village and P.O. Bijayi, P.S. Ghorasahan, District-East Champaran at Motihari.

¶15

Jafre Alam Son of Aash Mohammad Resident of Village and P.O. Bijayi, P.S. Ghorasahan, District-East Champaran at Motihari.

¶16

Samsul Haque Son of Late Sheikh Manir, Resident of Village and P.O. Bijayi, P.S. Ghorasahan, District-East Champaran at Motihari.

¶17

Jaida Khatoon Wife of Late Shakirullah Resident of Village and P.O. Bijayi, P.S. Ghorasahan, District-East Champaran at Motihari.

¶18

Sarwar Alam Son of Md. Kamrul Resident of Village and P.O. Bijayi, P.S. Ghorasahan, District-East Champaran at Motihari.

¶19

... ... Petitioner/s

¶20

Versus

¶21

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secrerary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Principal Secreary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶22

The Divisional Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzafarpur.

¶23

The District Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari,

¶24

Patna High Court CWJC No.6012 of 2022(2) dt.07-07-2022 2/3

¶25

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sikrahana,

¶26

The Circle Officer, Ghorasahan, District-East Champaran at Motihari.

¶27

Md. Azad Son of Md. Shoaib, Resident of Village and P.O. Bijayi, P.S. Ghorasahan, District-East Champaran at Motihari.

¶28

... ... Respondent/s

¶29

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Awnish Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr.Birendra Prasad Singh, AC to SC-19 ======================================================

¶30

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶31

2 07-07-2022

¶32

Though the present writ petition has been filed seeking to challenge the order dated 14.2.2017, passed in Encroachment Case No. 5/2016-17, by the Circle Officer, Ghorasahan, District-East Champaran at Motihari, however, the learned counsel for the petitioners has limited their prayer to grant of liberty to the petitioners to file appropriate appeal.

¶33

Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to file appeal against the aforesaid order dated 14.2.2017 and in case, such an appeal is filed within a period of four weeks from today, the appellate authority shall not be impeded by the issue of limitation and shall pass appropriate orders on merit and in accordance with law.

¶34

Patna High Court CWJC No.6012 of 2022(2) dt.07-07-2022 3/3

¶35

It is needless to state that for a period of four weeks from today, status quo, existing as on today, shall be maintained.

¶36

At this juncture, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that liberty be also granted to move the appellate authority for grant of interim orders. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

¶37

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶38

Ajay/-

¶39

Mohammad Ajajul Haq v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammad Ajajul Haq v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Surendra Paswan @ Surendra Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Vijay Paswan @ Vijay Kumar Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Dhanji Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Narendra Giria Vs The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Registration Excise and Proghibition Department

Mustufa @ Mustufa Mian Vs The State of Bihar

Menka Kumari Vs The State of Bihar