Two writ petitions challenging termination from service. The Court allowed the petitions by following a previous order in Amit Kumar's case (C.W.J.C No. 5537 of 2020), setting aside the impugned orders and directing consequential relief.
Impugned order dated 23.09.2019 set aside; consequential direction applicable pursuant to Amit Kumar's order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5764 of 2020
======================================================
Shailesh Kumar Son of Late Akhilesh Sharma Resident of Satsang Nagar, Raja Bazar, Police Station- Jehanabad, District- Jehanabad.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
with
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6308 of 2020
======================================================
Suraj Kumar Son of Sri Mahendra Prasad Resident of Village- Bijavar, Police Station- Dhanarua, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
Patna High Court CWJC No.5764 of 2020 dt.22-04-2022 2/3
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5764 of 2020) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar @ Alok Kr Shahi, Advocate Smt. Archana Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sheo Shankar Prasad, SC 8 (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6308 of 2020) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar @ Alok Kr Shahi, Advocate Smt. Archana Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Manish Kumar, GP 4 Mr. Ajay Kumar, AC to GP 4 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 22-04-2022
C.W.J.C. No. 5764 of 2020 and C.W.J.C. No. 6308 of 2020
Heard learned counsel for the parties through virtual
court proceedings.
following relief/reliefs:
“(i) For issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing Order dated 23.-09-2019 in which the petitioner has been terminated/removed from service as Executive Assistant at Jehanabad Circle, Jehanabad.
(ii) For any other consequential relief/reliefs for which the petitioner is entitle by this Hon’ble Court in the facts and circumstances of the present case.”
Patna High Court CWJC No.5764 of 2020 dt.22-04-2022 3/3
(P. B. Bajanthri, J)
GAURAV S./-
| AFR/NAFR | |
|---|---|
| CAV DATE | |
| Uploading Date | 27.04.2022 |
| Transmission Date |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petitions for quashing of termination orders ought to be allowed by following the order in Amit Kumar's case.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Amit Kumar vs. The State of BiharFollowed¶4
C.W.J.C No. 5537 of 2020
Shailesh Kumar
Suraj Kumar
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar
P. B. Bajanthri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
