Single judge oral order dismissing a writ petition as withdrawn and infructuous after the petitioner's grievance was redressed during pendency. No substantive legal proposition derived.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.555 of 2022
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s Versus
Patna High Court CWJC No.555 of 2022(2) dt.02-02-2022 2/2
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Niranjan Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Md. N.H. Khan (Sc1) ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI ORAL ORDER
2 02-02-2022 This matter is heard via video conferencing due to circumstances prevailing on account of the COVID-19 Pandemic.
During the pendency of the present petition the petitioner’s grievance is stated to have been redressed by the competent authority as such the present petition does not survive for consideration.
Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn having become infructuous.
(P. B. Bajanthri, J)
Vikash/-
U
Pankaj Chakravarti Ors.
The State of Bihar Ors.
P. B. Bajanthri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
