Disposed

Kartik Devi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC13 Sept 2022CWJC/24041/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought writ relief to remove encroachments and a mandir on Zila Parishad land. The court granted liberty for the petitioner to approach the Circle Officer under the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956, for immediate redressal and disposed of the writ petition on those terms.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to approach the Circle Officer under the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956 for redressal within four weeks. Writ petition disposed.

Kartik Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.24041 of 2018

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Kartik Devi Wife of Vinod Kumar Prasad Resident of Village - Tajpur, P.S.Janta Bazar, District - Saran

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra.

¶7

The District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra

¶8

The Circle Officer, Lahladpur Block, Saran, Chapra

¶9

The Superintendent of Police, Saran at Chapra

¶10

The Officer-In-Charge, Janta Bazar Police Station, District - Saran, Chapra

¶11

... ... Respondent/s

¶12

======================================================

¶13

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Rishi Raj Sinha- SC 19 : Mr. Manoj Kr. Sinha, AC to SC 19

¶14

======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶16

2 13-09-2022

¶17

The present petition has been filed seeking the

¶18

following reliefs :-

¶19

“(i) To command dand direct the respondentAuthorities to remove the encroachment from the Public road at village-Tajpur, BlockLahladpur, PS-Janta Bazar, District-Saran, Bihari More of the both side of the road which is standing on Paigambarpur to Siwan road encroachment by local Shopkeepeers by putting Gumti and other structure on the road.

¶20

(ii) To further command and direct the respondent to remove the Hanuman Mandir which is being constructed on the land of

¶21

Patna High Court CWJC No.24041 of 2018(2) dt.13-09-2022 2/2

¶22

District Board (Zila Parishad) situated at Village-Tajpur, PS-Janta Bazar, BlockLahladpur, District-Saran.”

¶23

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the Circle Officer, Lahladpur Block, Saran, Chapra for redressal of his aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought, is granted.

¶24

It is needless to state that in case, the petitioner approaches the Circle Officer, Lahladpur Block, Saran, Chapra by filing appropriate petition under the provisions of the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956, within a period of four weeks from today, the same shall be considered, in accordance with law and after hearing the affected parties, appropriate orders shall be passed thereon, forthwith.

¶25

The writ petition stands disposed off on the aforesaid

¶26

terms.

¶27

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶28

rinkee/-

¶29

Kartik Devi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kartik Devi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ali Azam Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Manoj Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Jagdish Sah, Vs The State Of Bihar

Binod Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rakesh Panday Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Ashraf Ali and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.