Dismissed
Anil Kuer v. Vinod Pathak
Patna HCCWJC/20906/2021
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Patna High Court dismissed a civil writ petition for lack of prosecution. The petitioner failed to appear in court on the hearing date. No substantive legal issues were addressed.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
¶2
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20906 of 2021
¶3
In
¶4
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.379 of 2021
¶5
======================================================
¶6
Anil Kuer Widow of Late Ayodhya Pathak, resident of Village-Barharia, P.S. Chand, District-Kaimur.
¶7
... ... Petitioner/s
¶8
- Versus
¶9
- Vinod Pathak son of Late Ram Daras Pathak, resident of Village-Barharia, P.S. Chand, District-Kaimur.
¶10
- Ram Charitar Pathak, son of Late Kalap Nath Pathak, resident of VillageBarharia, P.S. Chand, District-Kaimur.
¶11
- Luxman Pathak, son of Late Paras Pathak, resident of Village-Barharia, P.S. Chand, District-Kaimur.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Anil Kuer Widow of Late Ayodhya Pathak
- respondent
Vinod Pathak
- respondent
Ram Charitar Pathak
- respondent
Luxman Pathak
- respondent
Laljee Pathak
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Mohit Kumar Shah
- Order 2 · Rajiv Roy
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court