Disposed

Arbind Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC1 Apr 2022CWJC/20609/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged confiscation order without exhausting appeal remedy. Court granted liberty to file appeal within 4 weeks, stayed auction during pendency, and noted new Rule 12(B) allows property release upon penalty payment.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted liberty to file appeal within 4 weeks; stay on auction during pendency; liberty reserved to approach Court for release of premises under new Rule 12(B).

Arbind Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20609 of 2021

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Arbind Kumar S/o Late Basudeo Sah Resident of Kali Asthan (Maheshpur), P.S.- Babarganj under (Mojahidpur), District- Bhagalpur.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Excise and Prohibition, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Bhagalpur.

¶8

¶9

¶10

The Superintendent of Police, Bhagalpur.

¶11

The Sub Divisional Officer (Sadar), District- Bhagalpur.

¶12

The Officer-in-charge as Investigating Officer of Babarganj under Mojahidpur Police Station, District- Bhagalpur.

¶13

... ... Respondent/s

¶14

======================================================

¶15

Appearance :

¶16

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Radha Raman Verma, advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Kumar Manish ( S.C. 5 )

¶17

======================================================

¶18

CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

¶19

and

¶20

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT

¶21

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR)

¶22

(The proceedings of the Court are being conducted through Video Conferencing and the Advocates joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residence.)

¶23

Date : 01-04-2022

¶24

Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s).

¶25

Patna High Court CWJC No.20609 of 2021 dt.01-04-2022 2/5

¶26

Patna High Court CWJC No.20609 of 2021 dt.01-04-2022 3/5

¶27

Petitioner has approached this Court without exhausting the statutory remedy of appeal against the impugned order, as such, petitioner is granted liberty to avail the remedy of appeal against the confiscation order passed by the Confiscating Authority- cum- District Magistrate, before the Appellate Authority and if any such appeal is filed within 4 weeks then appellate authority shall condone the delay in filing the appeal and shall decide the appeal on its own merit preferably within 8

¶28

Patna High Court CWJC No.20609 of 2021 dt.01-04-2022 4/5

¶29

weeks from the date of its filing.

¶30

During pendency of appeal, the confiscated property/ vehicle shall not be auction sold, if not already auction sold.

¶31

¶32

It is submitted on behalf of counsel for the State that during pendency of writ petition, there has been amendment in the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Rules, 2021 and a new Rule 12(B) has been inserted which reads as under:-

¶33

" 12B. Release of Premises on Payment of Penalty: - (1) If any premises or part thereof has been seized or sealed by any police or excise officer under the Act, then in terms of section-57B (2) of the Act, the Collector or an officer authorized by him, upon receipt of an application in Form V from the owner of the said premises, may release or unseal the said premises or part thereof upon payment of such penalty as may be ordered by the Collector or the officer authorized by him. Provided, where it is not possible to ascertain the owner of the premises or the owner is not coming forward, the Collector or the officer authorized by him shall, after waiting for 15 days from the date of seizure/sealing, proceed to confiscate the premises as per the provisions of the Act.

¶34

(2) The Collector or the officer authorized by him shall have due regard to the economic status of the individual, nature of his involvement in the crime, location of the premises and the quantum of intoxicant recovered while deciding the quantum of fine to be paid by the individual. However, the fine shall not be less than Rs. one Lakh in any case. In any case, the Collector shall not wait beyond 15 days from the date of seizure/sealing and if during this period, the accused/owner does not pay up the penalty he shall proceed with the confiscation/auction.

¶35

(3) Notwithstanding above, if on a report by police officer or excise officer, the Collector or the officer authorized by him is satisfied that releasing the premises shall not be in the public interest, the Collector or the officer authorized by him shall proceed ahead with the confiscation of the said premises or part thereof and its subsequent auction/disposal.

¶36

(4) Such penalty shall be, regardless of the outcome of the trial if any, before the Special Court, non-refundable.

¶37

Patna High Court CWJC No.20609 of 2021 dt.01-04-2022 5/5

¶38

(5) The owner of the Premises shall, after the release of the premises, allow the inspection of the premises as and when desired by the authorities.

¶39

[Explanation: In all pending/ongoing cases of confiscation/ auction of premises, the Collector or the officer authorized by him may give an opportunity to the existing owner to pay the aforesaid penalty and get the premises released. Upon satisfaction of ownership and upon payment of such penalty, the ongoing confiscation/auction proceeding may be dropped and the premises released.]"

¶40

In view of amendment in the Excise Act, and same being applicable in pending case, it shall be open for the petitioner to get his/her house unsealed after making payment of penalty in terms of Rule 12(B) inserted by amending Bihar Prohibition and Excise Rules, 2021.

¶41

Liberty reserved to petitioner to approach this Court for same and subsequent cause of action, if need so arises.

¶42

With aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of.

¶43

(Sanjay Karol, CJ)

¶44

( S. Kumar, J)

¶45

veena/rajiv-

¶46

AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date

Arbind Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arbind Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rohit Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Jitendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Gaurav Yadav @ Gauraw Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Chandani Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Udgar Yadav @ Ramuadgar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Gulabi Devi Vs The State of Bihar