The petitioner challenged orders suspending and cancelling his food shop licence from 2007-2008. The Court dismissed the writ petition due to inordinate delay and the operation of the new Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System Order, 2016.
Petitioner's writ petition is dismissed due to inordinate delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19301 of 2017
======================================================
Navin Kumar Yadav Son of Late Chandrika Prasad Yadav Resident of Village Yadav Nagar Leela, P.S. Bhawanipur, District Purnea.
... ... Petitioner/s
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjeev Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the State : Mr.Uday Pratap Singh, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR)
Date : 02-12-2022
Heard Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mishra, learned
Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Uday Pratap Singh for the State.
The petitioner’s licence was suspended in the year 2007, which was ultimately cancelled and the
appeal against such order of cancellation also stood dismissed in the year 2008.
The petitioner had been a licensee of an
Patna High Court CWJC No.19301 of 2017 dt.02-12-2022 2/2
earlier Control Order.
The afore-noted orders had been challenged
by the petitioner in the year 2017.
There is no good reason for us to interfere with those orders after such a long delay, more so, when
a new control order, namely, Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016 is in operation.
This inordinate delay in approaching the
Court prompts us to dismiss the petition.
The petition stands dismissed.
(Ashutosh Kumar, J)
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)
| HR/Sonali/- | |
|---|---|
| AFR/NAFR | NAFR |
| CAV DATE | NA |
| Uploading Date | 07.12.2022 |
| Transmission Date | NA |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with orders suspending and cancelling the petitioner's licence despite a long delay in approaching the Court.
Navin Kumar Yadav
The State Of Bihar
District Magistrate cum Collector, Purnea
Sub-Divisional Officer, Dhamdaha
District Supply Officer, Purnea
Block Supply Officer, Purnea
Ashutosh Kumar
Nawneet Kumar Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
