This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14636 of 2015
======================================================
Manoj Kumar Son of Upendra Prasad Singh Resident of village - Mohanpur, Police Station Begusarai Muffasil , District - Begusarai
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Ms. Roona, AC to GP 7 Mr. Arbind Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Janardan Pd. Singh, Adv. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
2 22-12-2022 No one appears for the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the respondent / Power Grid
Corporation of India referring to the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent nos. 3 to 7 submits that damages towards cutting of trees as well as crops have already been paid to the petitioner. Accordingly, this writ application has become infructuous.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for
Patna High Court CWJC No.14636 of 2015(2) dt.22-12-2022 2/2
the respondent – Power Grid Corporation of India, this writ application is dismissed as infructuous.
(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)
praful/-
U
Manoj Kumar
State Of Bihar
Power Grid Corporation of India
Anil Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
