Oral order disposing of a writ petition where the court allowed the petitioner to plead pendency to counter an objection regarding delay in approaching the appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12100 of 2017
======================================================
Rohit Kumar Ravidas Son of Late Nanku Ravidas, Resident of MohallaNadraganj, Gaya, P.O. H.P.O. , P.S. Civil Line, District- Gaya.
... ... Petitioner/s
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr.Jitendra Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Union of India : Mr.Abhay Shankar Jha, C.G.C.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER
4 19-09-2022
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the objection raised by the Union of India in its counter affidavit regarding maintainability of the writ application, he would be approaching the appropriate forum. It is his apprehension that if he approaches the appropriate forum, matter is likely to be dismissed on the ground of delay itself.
In view thereof, this Court would observe that pendency of the matter before this Court would be available to the petitioner to meet the issue of delay in the forum.
Writ application stands disposed of.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
PNM
U
Rohit Kumar Ravidas Son of Late Nanku Ravidas
The Union Of India
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
