Petitioner filed a writ petition in the Civil Writ Jurisdiction case. Her counsel argued the petition became infructuous due to subsequent events. The court dismissed the writ petition without detailed reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 11565 of 2021
======================================================
Pallawi Kumari D/o - Ram Kumar Ram, resident of Village - Mastichak, P.S. - Parsa, District- Saran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr Bipin Chandra, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr Dhurjati Kr Pd, GP XIV ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD
ORAL ORDER
3 22-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the
respondents.
It is submitted by petitioner’s counsel that due to events, subsequent to filing of this writ petition, the same has become infructuous.
This writ petition is dismissed accordingly.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
M.E.H. /-
U
Pallawi Kumari
State of Bihar
Principal Secretary, Animal and Fisheries Resources Department
Principal Secretary, Finance Department
Director, Fisheries Officers Hostel Block
District Magistrate, Darbhanga
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
