Dismissed

Jully Devi v. the State of Bihar through Director Genral of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna

Patna HC1 Dec 2022CR. WJC/1301/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court, treating the non-recovery of a minor daughter as a matter requiring alternative judicial intervention, directed the petitioner to file an application under Section 98 of Cr.P.C. before the District Magistrate instead of proceeding via this criminal writ jurisdiction.

What did the court decide?

Directed the petitioner to file an application under Section 98 of Cr.P.C. before the District Magistrate within four weeks.

Jully Devi Vs the State of Bihar through Director… — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1301 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-648 Year-2022 Thana- ALAMGANJ District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Jully Devi, aged about 38 years, General-Female, W/O Tarkeshwar Sah, Resident of Village- Chailital, in front of Bajrangbali, P.S.- Alamganj, District- Patna.

¶5

... ... Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar through Director General of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Inspector General of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The Superintendent of Police, District Patna, Bihar.

¶10

The Officer In Charge, Khajekalan Police Station, District- Patna.

¶11

……..Respondent Ist Set.

¶12

Sunny @ Sadar User of Mobile No- 6204633687, 9308635246.

¶13

... ... Respondent 2^nd Set

¶14

======================================================

¶15

Appearance :

¶16

For the Petitioner : Mr. Jay Ram Prasad, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Lalit Kishore (A.G)

¶17

======================================================

¶18

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH and

¶19

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶20

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH)

¶21

2 01-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶22

counsel for the State.

¶23

The following relief has been sought for on behalf of the petitioner in the present criminal writ application.

¶24

“For issuance of appropriate writ/writs, order/orders and direction/directions to the respondents authority to recover the minor girl of the petitioner who has been kidnapped by the respondent 2^nd set and for taking step to arrest the respondent 2^nd set, in connection with Alamganj P.S. Case No. 648/2022 dated 25.08.2022 registered for the offence under

¶25

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1301 of 2022(2) dt.01-12-2022 2/3

¶26

Section 366(A) of the I.P.C. which was lodged by the petitioner.

¶27

The facts which lead to filing of the present criminal writ application are that the petitioner has filed Khajekalan P.S. Case No. 648 of 2022 registered under Section 366(A) of the I.P.C. against one Sunny @ Sardar (respondent no. 5) on 28.08.2022 for abduction of her minor daughter. The grievance of the petitioner is that till date the daughter of the petitioner has not been recovered. Hence, the present criminal writ application has been preferred.

¶28

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that her minor daughter is still traceless and the police has not taken any steps to recover her daughter.

¶29

Learned counsel for the State submits that investigation is under process.

¶30

Considering the aforesaid facts of the case, we find that the petitioner has an alternative remedy available under Section 98 of Cr.P.C. Therefore, we deem it appropriate to direct the petitioner to file an application under Section 98 of Cr.P.C. before the District Magistrate, Patna, within a period of four weeks from today.

¶31

In case, the petitioner files an application under the above mentioned provision of Cr.P.C., the District Magistrate,

¶32

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1301 of 2022(2) dt.01-12-2022 3/3

¶33

Patna, shall pass necessary order, on the application filed on behalf of the petitioner, within a period of eight weeks from the date of filing of such application, in accordance with law.

¶34

With the aforesaid direction, the present criminal writ application stands disposed of.

¶35

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶36

U.K./- U T

¶37

( Shailendra Singh, J)

Jully Devi v. the State of Bihar through Director Genral of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jully Devi v. the State of Bihar through Director Genral of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Maksudhan Sah @ Ripu Sah @ Ripsudan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Laxman Ray Vs The State of Bihar through the Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna.

Bigan Dom and Anr. Vs State of Bihar

Jawahar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary of Home Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

Kundan Kumari Vs The State of Bihar through its Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Main Secretariat, Patna- 800015

Sudhir Kumar Vs The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur