In this criminal revision, the High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the application. The plea was dismissed as withdrawn, and the Principal Judge of the Family Court was directed to execute the impugned judgment.
Permission to withdraw the application granted; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL REVISION No.378 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Kishanganj
======================================================
... ... Petitioners
Versus
... ... Opposite Parties.
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ram Prawesh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.B.N. Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER
petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application.
Permission is granted.
This application is dismissed as withdrawn.
Let the learned Principal Judge, Family Court,
Kishanganj proceed to execute the impugned judgment as expeditiously as possible.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
Rajeev/-
U
Note: The ordersheet duly signed has been attached with the record. However, in view of the present arrangements, during Pandemic period all concerned shall act on the basis of the copy of the order uploaded on the High Court website under the heading ‘Judicial Orders Passed During The Pandemic Period’.
Mukul Sharma
Sapana Devi
The State of Bihar
Sapana Devi
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
