Allowed

Bablu Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC20 Sept 2022CR. MISC./9641/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner charged under Section 392 IPC. The court noted the petitioner was not named in the FIR, had clean antecedents, and the charge sheet was submitted, warranting release on bond with conditions to ensure trial cooperation.

What did the court decide?

Ordering release on bail in connection with Mansi P.S. Case No. 231/2020 upon furnishing bond of ₹10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions.

Bablu Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9641 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-231 Year-2020 Thana- MANSI District- Khagaria

¶3

======================================================

¶4

BABLU SINGH SON OF RAMANAND SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- BANGALIYA, P.O.- ROHIYAR, P.S.- MANSI, DISTRICTKHAGARIA.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Om Prakash Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md. Mushtaque Alam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶10

6 20-09-2022

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶12

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Mansi P.S. Case No. 231/2020 registered for the offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

As per prosecution case, the informant’s motorcycle, ATM card, mobile phone, cash Rs.5,000/- and other important documents have been snatched by the unknown persons.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the FIR. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 11.12.2021 and bears no criminal antecedent. Neither snatched mobile phone nor any motorcycle

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9641 of 2022(6) dt.20-09-2022 2/3

¶16

has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and he is not involved in the said crime. Charge sheet has been submitted in this case and there is no likelihood of tampering with the prosecution evidence. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner has made communication 17 times from snatched mobile in question after three months of the occurrence i.e. from 15.11.2020 to 05.12.2020.

¶17

The learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that as per CDR of the petitioner, it is clearly indicated that the petitioner has utilized the snatched mobile for the purpose of communication.

¶18

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody, petitioner is not named in the FIR, charge sheet has already been submitted in this case and there is no likelihood of tampering with the prosecution evidence and keeping in view clean antecedent of petitioner and also taking into consideration the material available on record, let the petitioner above named be released on bail if trial is preferably not concluded within six months from the date of receipt of the order on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9641 of 2022(6) dt.20-09-2022 3/3

¶20

satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Khagaria in connection with Mansi P.S. Case No. 231/2020, subject to following conditions:-

¶21

(i) One of the bailors shall be either father or mother or sister or brother or wife or the person who has sworn the affidavit in bail application.

¶22

(ii) Petitioner will co-operate in trial and will remain present on all dates and absence for two consecutive dates without appropriate permission, would be a ground for cancellation of bail by the learned Trial court itself.

¶23

(iii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶24

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶25

amitkumar/-

¶26

U T

Bablu Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bablu Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nitish Kumar @ Nitesh Kumar @ Nehal Vs The State of Bihar

Bhola Manjhi Vs the State of Bihar

Anik Mahto @ Anik Mandal Vs the State of Bihar

Anil Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Ajay Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Jitendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar