Allowed

Raju Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC6 Jul 2022CR. MISC./9640/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Criminal Miscellaneous order seeks bail for the petitioner accused of possessing a country-made pistol and a live cartridge under the Arms Act. The court granted bail subject to conditions regarding appearance in court and non-tampering with evidence.

What did the court decide?

Release of the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-. with two sureties of the like amount each.

Raju Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9640 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-860 Year-2021 Thana- PHULWARISHARIF District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RAJU KUMAR S/o - Premchand Das R/o Village - Abbulodipur Tola, P.S.Janipur, District - Patna.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sheo Nandan Pandit For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ramchandra Sahni ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 06-07-2022

¶12

Let the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, be

¶13

removed within a period of four weeks from today.

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶15

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Janipur P.S. Case No. 860 of 2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26/35 of the Arms Act.

¶16

As per seizure list, there is alleged recovery of one country made pistol and one live cartridge from the possession of the petitioner.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 11.10.2021. Petitioner bears no criminal antecedent. Charge-sheet has already been submitted in the case and there is no likelihood of tampering the prosecution

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9640 of 2022(2) dt.06-07-2022 2/3

¶19

evidence. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is quite innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the case. As per F.I.R., one country made Katta and one cartridge was recovered from the possession of the petitioner and as a matter of fact, such article was recovered from the tempo nor from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is owner of Tempo in question and he was learning day to day with another friend with regard to driving of the tempo.

¶20

The learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

¶21

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody, keeping in view clean antecedent of petitioner, charge-sheet has already been submitted and also taking into consideration the material available on record, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., VIII, Patna in connection with Janipur P.S. Case No. 860 of 2021, subject to following conditions:-

¶22

(i) One of the bailors shall be either father or mother or sister or brother or wife or the person who has sworn the affidavit in bail application.

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9640 of 2022(2) dt.06-07-2022 3/3

¶24

(ii) Petitioner will co-operate in trial and will remain present on all dates and absence for two consecutive dates would be a ground for cancellation of bail by the learned Trial court itself.

¶25

(iii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶26

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶27

shahzad/-

¶28

U T

Raju Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raju Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pramod Kumar @ Pramod Kumar Sah @ Doctor Saheb Vs The State of Bihar

Abhinandan Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Vivek Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Saheb Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Prakash Thakur Vs the State of Bihar

Raman Kumar @ Ramlal Vs The State of Bihar