Allowed

Shera Sahani @ Sachin Sahani @ Sheera Sahani @ Sahain Sahani v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC19 Dec 2022CR. MISC./9319/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single Judge Court granted bail to the petitioner in a murder and arms case. The accused, having been in custody, was released on furnishing a bail bond under Section 437(3) CrPC, considering lack of substantive evidence connecting him to the crime.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each.

Shera Sahani @ Sachin Sahani @ Sheera Sahani @ Sahain Sahani… — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9319 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-108 Year-2021 Thana- HARSIDHI District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Shera Sahani @ Sachin Sahani @ Sheera Sahani @ Sahain Sahani, S/O Raj Kishor Sahni, R/o village- Damo Virti, P.S.- Harsidhi, District- East Champaran

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Kundan Rathore@ Kundan Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Dilip Kumar No. 1, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 19-12-2022

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶14

Let the defect (s), if any, as pointed out by the office, be removed within a period of four weeks.

¶15

In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 108 of 2021 registered for the alleged offences under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶16

As per prosecution case, F.I.R. named co-accused persons came to the shop of the husband of the informant and they fired upon him causing his death at the spot. The occurrence took place in the background of earlier dispute of coaccused Surendra Singh and others with the husband of the

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9319 of 2022(3) dt.19-12-2022 2/3

¶18

informant. The name of the petitioner transpired during investigation as one of the accused persons involved in this case.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner was named in this case in the confessional statement of co-accused Jitendra Kumar. There is specific allegation of use of fire arm against co-accused Surendra Singh. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and nothing incriminating has been recovered from his possession or at his instance. Co-accused Chandan Sahni has been granted bail by a Coordinate Bench vide order dated 05.04.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 5653 of 2022. Charge sheet has been submitted in this case and the petitioner is in custody since 25.11.2021. The petitioner has got clean antecedent.

¶20

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner submitting that the name of the petitioner came up in the confessional statement of co-accused.

¶21

Having regard to the facts and circumstances and submission made on behalf of the parties and considering the lack of substantive material to connect the petitioner with the offences as alleged and also considering the submission of

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9319 of 2022(3) dt.19-12-2022 3/3

¶23

charge sheet along with period of custody of the petitioner, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Mothihari in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 108 of 2021, subject to the conditions mentioned in Section 437(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and also the following conditions:

¶24

(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.

¶25

(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below.

¶26

(iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

¶27

(Arun Kumar Jha, J)

¶28

Gautam/daya

¶29

U T

Shera Sahani @ Sachin Sahani @ Sheera Sahani @ Sahain Sahani v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shera Sahani @ Sachin Sahani @ Sheera Sahani @ Sahain Sahani v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ranjeet Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Uday Tanti Vs The State of Bihar

Brajesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Harshit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Brahmdeo Singh @ Brahamadeo Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Peyare Singh Vs The State of Bihar