The High Court at Patna granted written permission to the petitioner to withdraw his pending anticipatory bail application following his arrest, dismissing the application as having become infructuous.
Permission to withdraw the application accorded; application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9102 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-334 Year-2021 Thana- OBRA District- Aurangabad
======================================================
BINOD KUMAR @ BINOD MEHTA S/o Ram Briksh Mehta R/o villageSonhuli, P.S.- Obra, District- Aurangabad
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bindeshwar Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER
during pendency of the anticipatory bail petition, petitioner has been arrested. He, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the application.
Permission is accorded. The application is accordingly dismissed as having become infructous.
(Shailendra Singh, J)
s.hassan/-
U T
Binod Kumar @ Binod Mehta
The State of Bihar
Shailendra Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
