Allowed

Vijay Yadav @ Vijay Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC28 Jul 2022CR. MISC./8975/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a murder case involving Section 302 IPC, subject to furnishing a bond of Rs.50,000 with two sureties and adherence to specific statutory and conditional restrictions.

What did the court decide?

Granted bail on ₹50,000 with two sureties of like amount each, subject to Section 437(3) CrPC conditions and specific affidavits.

Vijay Yadav @ Vijay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8975 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-6 Year-2021 Thana- AAYAR District- Bhojpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Vijay Yadav @ Vijay Kumar S/o Late Sudama Yadav R/o village- Baligaon, P.S.- Ayar, District- Bhojpur (Ara) ... ... Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party

¶7

======================================================

¶8

Appearance :

¶9

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bachan Jee Ojha, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ramchandra Singh, APP.

¶10

======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 28-07-2022

¶13

Let the defect, if any, be removed within two weeks from today.

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶15

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Ayar P.S. Case No. 06 of 2021 lodged under Sections 363, 302 and 120 B of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

As per the prosecution case, apprehension was made by the informant that his nephew went to do Patvan work on the field but not returned and he has shown his apprehension against the petitioner and his brothers. On the basis of suspicion this case has been lodged.

¶17

Case diary has also been called for in this case.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that name

¶19

of the petitioner has figured in this case by virtue of suspicion raised by the informant himself, because there were a solid discussion which takes place on two occasions between the

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8975 of 2022(3) dt.28-07-2022 2/3

¶21

petitioner and his family with the deceased. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that in case diary also, only suspicion has been raised against the petitioner. He further submits that petitioner is in custody since 01.09.2021, chargesheet has already been filed and his antecedent is clean, therefore, bail may be granted to him.

¶22

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that in Para-17 of the case diary, it transpires that the body of deceased (in view of the informant) has been recovered. He further raised the statement made in Paragraph 4, 5 and 6 of the case diary by which the witnesses have narrated about the discussion and threat which takes place between the deceased and the petitioner and his family members. Learned counsel for the state further submits that such threat indicates that there is every chance and every apprehension that petitioner and other persons have caused this offence.

¶23

In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, let the petitioner above named, be granted bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.D.J.-II^nd Bhojpur, Ara, in connection with Ayar P.S. Case No. 06 of 2021, subject to the conditions as

¶24

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8975 of 2022(3) dt.28-07-2022 3/3

¶25

laid down under Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C. with other following conditions:

¶26

A. The petitioner shall support in trial and shall appear physically before the lower court on each and every date fixed, in case of non-appearance for two consecutive dates without sufficient cause, shall resulted into cancellation of his bail bond.

¶27

B. One of the bailor shall be close relative who shall file affidavit before the court about his relation with the petitioner.

¶28

C. The petitioner shall file an affidavit at the time of furnishing of bail bond that he shall not involve in such criminal activity during the continuance of present bail bond, violation of this condition shall be resulted into cancellation of his present bail bond.

¶29

With this observation, the bail application stands

¶30

allowed.

¶31

(Dr. Anshuman, J)

¶32

ritik/aditi

¶33

U T

Vijay Yadav @ Vijay Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Yadav @ Vijay Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suraj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sudhanshu Raj @ Sudhanshu Vs The State of Bihar

Manish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Suraj Mnjhi @ Suraj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Mithun Paswan Vs the State of Bihar

Ritesh Dutt Vs The State of Bihar