Single judge order allowing anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a Section 498A case, directing surrender within four weeks and furnishing a bail bond with two sureties.
Petitioner granted anticipatory bail directed to surrender in four weeks subject to furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8852 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-64 Year-2016 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Kishanganj
====================================================== ANZAR ALAM S/o Late Abbas Alam Resident of Village- Chakla, P.S. and Distt- Kishanganj ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ram Prawesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Kanhaiya Kishore(App100)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER
3 25-01-2022
This matter has been taken up for hearing online because of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is expected to honour his undertaking to remove the defects as pointed out by the office when called upon to do so by the office.
The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case no C64 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.
As per allegation in the FIR, petitioner along with his family members have tortured in various ways due to non-fulfillment dowry demand and finally they ousted her after snatching her belongings.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8852 of 2020(3) dt.25-01-2022 2/2
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioner is husband of the complainant and has been falsely implicated in this case. He has never demanded any thing from the complainant. It is further contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that he is willing to lead the conjugal life with opposite party no. 2 by keeping her with full honour and dignity.
Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer of bail.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner wants to keep his wife with full honour and dignity, this Court is inclined to enlarge him on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Complaint Case no. C-64 of 2016 he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)
sushma/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner apprehending arrest in a Section 498A case.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Anzar Alam
The State of Bihar
Namuna Khatoon
Sunil Kumar Panwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
