Allowed

Ajay Das v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC2 Aug 2022CR. MISC./8022/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a criminal case. The petitioner undertook to remove defects within three weeks. The court granted bail subject to conditions under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. if he surrenders within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each if he surrenders within six weeks.

Ajay Das Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8022 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2021 Thana- PUSA District- Samastipur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ajay Das Son Of Prabhu Das Resident Of Village - Shri Rampur Ayodhya, P.S. - Pusa, District - Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Md. Hussamuddin Azad For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Asha Devi ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 02-08-2022

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

¶14

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 342, 506, 452, 324, 307, 379, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

Petitioner is said to have hold the father of the informant and co-accused Prabhu Das having the knife in his hand, attacked on his father resultantly father of the informant got injured and fell down on the floor.

¶16

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8022 of 2022(2) dt.02-08-2022 2/2

¶18

implicated in this case. He submits that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

¶19

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

¶20

bail.

¶21

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner, let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Pusa P.S. Case No. 57 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶22

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶23

devendra/-

¶24

U T

Ajay Das v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajay Das v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pankaj Kumar Yadav @ Pankaj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Mahanand Mukhiya Vs The State of Bihar

MD Sarfaraj Alam @ Munna Vs The State of Bihar

Rajesh Mahto @ Rajesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Nagendra Mishra Vs the State of Bihar

Ashok Chaudhary @ Ashok Kumar Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar