Dismissed

Dilip Sah v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC26 Aug 2022CR. MISC./7564/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order rejects the petitioner's application for anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged dowry death. The court directed the removal of judgment defects within one month and dismissed the bail plea finding the petitioner entitled to arrest due to alleged involvement.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail rejected; defects in the judgment must be removed within one month.

Dilip Sah Vs the State of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7564 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-107 Year-2021 Thana- HATHAURI District- Muzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

DILIP SAH Son of Shivjee Sah Resident of Village - Simri, P.s.- Hathauri, Distt.- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Arun Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md. Fahimuddin

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY

¶13

ORAL ORDER

¶14

2 26-08-2022

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month.

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Anil Shah learned APP for the State.

¶17

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Hathauri P.S. Case No.107 of 2021, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶18

As per allegation, the marriage of the daughter of the informant was solemnized with Anil Shah in the year 2021. The matrimonial inmates subjected the daughter of the informant to cruelty for non fulfillment of dowry demand of T.V., gold chain etc. On 29.04.2021, the informant received the information that the accused persons had committed murder of her daughter. When the

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7564 of 2022(2) dt.26-08-2022 2/2

¶20

informant went to the matrimonial house of her daughter, she saw her dead body.

¶21

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is elder brother of the husband of deceased. He has no concern with day to day affairs of the couple and he resides separately from the husband of the deceased.

¶22

The witnesses in paragraph nos. 58, 59 and 60 have supported the entire occurrence. The petitioner is named in the FIR and there is allegation that the accused persons committed dowry death of the deceased Manchan Devi within only two months of her marriage. As such, the petitioner is not entitled to privilege of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, it is rejected.

¶23

Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided in para-1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

¶24

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

¶25

niku/Sonali/-

¶26

U T

Dilip Sah v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dilip Sah v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anku Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Prabhat Kumar Rajak @ Pappu Vs The State of Bihar

Moti Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Jabbar Vs The State of Bihar

Vishwar Chaudhary @ Vishwajeet Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Shanti Devi Vs The State of Bihar