Allowed

Sudhir Kumar Sahni @ Sudhir Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC12 Apr 2022CR. MISC./7525/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought regular bail in a prohibition case where 207 litres of liquor were recovered from the arrested spot. The High Court granted bail on furnishing a bond and sureties, considering the petitioner had no criminal antecedent.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be enlarged on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount to the Special Judge, Excise Act, Sitamarhi.

Sudhir Kumar Sahni @ Sudhir Kumar Vs The State… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7525 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-214 Year-2021 Thana- BELA District- Sitamarhi

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SUDHIR KUMAR SAHNI @ SUDHIR KUMAR S/o- Shivsharan Sahni Resident of Village - Bakchora, P.S. - Bela, District - Sitamarhi.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Virendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 12-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶12

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant

¶13

of regular bail in a case registered under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶14

As per the prosecution case, 207 litres of liquor was recovered from the accused persons and the petitioner was arrested at the spot.

¶15

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case under a misunderstanding. The alleged place of recovery is by the side of the river. The petitioner has no concern with the seized liquor nor any incriminating article has been recovered from his possession. He is in custody since 18.11.2021 and has no criminal antecedent.

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7525 of 2022(2) dt.12-04-2022 2/2

¶17

Heard learned APP for the State.

¶18

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts of the case specially the petitioner not having any criminal antecedent, the Court directs the petitioner to be enlarged on bail in connection with Bela P.S. Case no. 214 of 2021 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.D.J-II-cum-Special Judge, Excise Act, Sitamarhi.

¶19

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶20

Prakash/-

¶21

Sudhir Kumar Sahni @ Sudhir Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sudhir Kumar Sahni @ Sudhir Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lalbabu Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Yogi Yadav @ Yogendra Kumar Yogesh @ Yogendra Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Mukesh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Daymala Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Vijay Rai @ Vijay Kumar @ Prashant Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Kamakhya Giri Vs the State of Bihar