Allowed

Vijay Singh@Vijay Prasad Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC1 Aug 2022CR. MISC./7159/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving assault,AttemptedMurder, cheating, and Arms Act offences. The court allowed bail on the condition that the petitioner removes procedural defects within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail if arrested or surrenders within six weeks, by furnishing Rs. 25,000 bond with two sureties of like amount.

Vijay Singh@Vijay Prasad Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7159 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-347 Year-2020 Thana- MANSI District- Khagaria

¶3

======================================================

¶4

VIJAY SINGH@VIJAY PRASAD SINGH Son of Late Narayan Singh Resident of Village - Amani, P.S.- Mansi, Distt.- Khagaria.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajesh Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shyam Kumar Singh, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 01-08-2022

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceedings. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within stipulated period, office will place the matter before the Bench.

¶14

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 385, 504, 506/34 of the IPC and 27 of the Arms Act.

¶15

The allegation against the petitioner is that he along with other accused persons have assaulted the informant and one Bundal Yadav fired with intent to kill. It is alleged that said offence has been committed due to non-fulfillment of demand

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7159 of 2022(2) dt.01-08-2022 2/3

¶17

of extortion money.

¶18

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to prior enmity. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation leveled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. The specific allegation is against the co-accused Bundal Yadav. It is submitted that there is an admitted land dispute between the parties. The alleged occurrence is said to have taken place on 13.12.2020 but the F.I.R. has been lodged on 21.12.2020, i.e. after a delay of eight days, without assigning any plausible explanation. Such delay in lodging the FIR creates doubt about the prosecution case. No person has got any injury in the alleged occurrence. Petitioner has one criminal antecedent.

¶19

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶20

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the delay in lodging the F.I.R., let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7159 of 2022(2) dt.01-08-2022 3/3

¶22

(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Mansi P.S. Case No.347 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶23

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶24

pallavi/-

¶25

U T

Vijay Singh@Vijay Prasad Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Singh@Vijay Prasad Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gopal Sah @ Gopal Kumar Sah Vs the State of Bihar

Mina Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Ramesh Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Pankaj Kumar Yadav @ Pankaj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Mahanand Mukhiya Vs The State of Bihar

MD Sarfaraj Alam @ Munna Vs The State of Bihar