This court dismissed a criminal miscellaneous petition for want of prosecution due to the petitioner's repeated requests for adjournment without assigning reasons and their absence on the date of hearing.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution; interim stay vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6730 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-43 Year-2019 Thana- MAHILA PS District- Katihar
======================================================
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s :
Dr. Ajeet Kumar
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER
5 18-08-2022
None appears on behalf of the petitioner, on repeated call.
Learned APP for the State is present.
It appears from perusal of previous two orders of this Court that the petitioner seeking adjournment without assigning any reason. Conduct of the petitioner is sufficient to gather that the petitioner loosed his interest to prosecute with present case.
Considering the above, the present petition is being dismissed in want of prosecution.
Further, interim stay vide order dated 05.05.2022 is stands
vacated.
(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
S.Katyayan/-
U T
KALAWATI DEBI W/o Ayodhya Prasad Ojha
Biendra Kumar Ojha @ Birendra Ojha
The State of Bihar
Sangita Kumari D/o- Late Satyanarayan Pandey
CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
