Allowed

Rahul Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC9 Dec 2022CR. MISC./65281/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge order granting bail to the petitioner in a criminal case concerning illegal manufacture of illicit liquor. The court found the seizure list doubtful due to lack of independent witnesses and released the accused on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount.

Rahul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65281 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-110 Year-2022 Thana- KIUL RAIL P.S. District- Lakhisarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rahul Kumar Son of Deepak Sao R/v- Oiyab, Ward No. 5, P.S.- Asthwa, District- Nalanda

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajive Ranjan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Khurshid Anwar, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 09-12-2022

¶12

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State through virtual Court proceedings.

¶13

Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Rail Kiul P.S. Case No. 110 of 2022 registered for the offence under Section 30(a)of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.

¶15

The accused/petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and is in custody since 22.09.2022.

¶16

The allegation against the petitioner is to be engaged in illegal trading/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where, there was recovery of 16.500 litres of illicit IMFL/country made liquor.

¶17

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that alleged bag, from where illicit liquor was recovered,

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65281 of 2022(2) dt.09-12-2022 2/2

¶19

is not connected in any manner with this petitioner, who is a man of clean antecedent. It is further submitted that seizure list appears doubtful being not supported by independent witnesses, rather by police personnels. While concluding the argument, it is submitted that investigation of this case is completed, for which charge-sheet has been submitted, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.

¶20

Learned APP, opposes the prayer of bail.

¶21

Considering the facts and circumstances as mentioned above, as seizure list appears doubtful being not supported by independent witnesses coupled with the fact that charge-sheet has been submitted, let the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail in connection with Rail Kiul P.S. Case No. 110 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Vth Additional District and Sessions Judge, Cum Exclusive Special Court-2, Excise Judge, Lakhisarai/concerned Court, subject to the conditions as mentioned under Section 437(3) of the Cr.P.C.

¶22

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)

¶23

Archana/-

¶24

U T

Rahul Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahul Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Mukhtar and Anr. Vs The State of Bihar

Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Ranjan @ Karu Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjeet Rishideo Vs The State of Bihar

Deepak Kumar @ Dipak Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Arjun Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Pappu Chaudhary Vs the State of Bihar