Allowed

Brij Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC16 Jun 2022CR. MISC./64712/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with U.I.P.S. Case no. 41 of 2021 under Sections 307, 354B IPC, directing release if arrested within four weeks upon furnishing a Rs 10,000 bail bond.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing Rs 10,000 bond with two sureties if arrested or surrenders within four weeks. Counsel directed to remove stamp defects.

Brij Paswan Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64712 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-41 Year-2021 Thana- BIKRAM District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

BRIJ PASWAN Son of Late Bhutali Paswan Resident of Baigwan Wajirpur, Police Station - Bikram, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ravi Shanker Pankaj For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anil Prasad Singh

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 16-06-2022

¶14

The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to

¶15

remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month.

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

¶17

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Bikram P.S. Case no. 41 of 2021 registered under sections 307, 354B and other allied section of the Indian Penal Code.

¶18

The main submissions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner are that the petitioner is simply named in the F.I.R and there is no allegation of any participating in the alleged occurrence actively and the main allegation is against co-accused persons Sidhnath Paswan and Vinod. Admittedly, there is land dispute between the parties and two co-accused

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64712 of 2021(2) dt.16-06-2022 2/2

¶20

persons carrying similar nature of allegation have been granted anticipatory bail by a coordinate bench of this court vide order dated 10.5.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 54325 of 2021.

¶21

Learned APP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. Considering the above submissions and petitioner's case being similar to co-accused persons referred to above who are enjoying anticipatory bail, let the above named petitioner, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate VI, Danapur District Patna in connection with Bikram P.S. Case no. 41 of 2021 subject to condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

¶22

(Shailendra Singh, J)

¶23

s.hassan/-

¶24

U T

Brij Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Brij Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sangeet Kumar @ Sanjeet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Pradeep Patel Vs The State of Bihar

Mithlesh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Bhagrasan Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Hemchandra Mishra Vs the State of Bihar