Allowed

Deonandan Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC23 Feb 2022CR. MISC./64489/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this anticipatory bail application, the High Court at Patna granted relief to the petitioners facing proceedings under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act. The court imposed specific conditions regarding bond, cooperation, and non-interference with witnesses.

What did the court decide?

Grant of anticipatory bail subject to personal bond of Rs. 20,000/- each and conditions to cooperate with investigation and not interfere with witnesses.

Deonandan Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64489 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-137 Year-2020 Thana- WARISLIGANJ District- Nawada

¶3

======================================================

¶4

DEONANDAN YADAV S/o Late Arjun Yadav R/o village- Dariyapur (Shekhpurwa), P.S.- Warsaliganj, District- Nawada

¶5

RAVINDRA YADAV S/o Bali Yadav R/o village- Dariyapur (Shekhpurwa), P.S.- Warsaliganj, District- Nawada

¶6

ANANDI YADAV S/o Late Khiran Yadav R/o village- Dariyapur (Shekhpurwa), P.S.- Warsaliganj, District- Nawada

¶7

GAUTAM YADAV S/o Umesh Yadav R/o village- Dariyapur (Shekhpurwa), P.S.- Warsaliganj, District- Nawada

¶8

RAMASHISH YADAV S/o Arjun Yadav R/o village- Dariyapur (Shekhpurwa), P.S.- Warsaliganj, District- Nawada

¶9

ANIL YADAV S/o Late Khiran Yadav R/o village- Dariyapur (Shekhpurwa), P.S.- Warsaliganj, District- Nawada

¶10

SATISH YADAV S/o Saryug Yadav R/o village- Dariyapur (Shekhpurwa), P.S.- Warsaliganj, District- Nawada

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶15

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pramod Kumar Verma, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Narsingh Tanti, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA

¶16

ORAL ORDER

¶17

2 23-02-2022 Heard the parties.

¶18

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Warisaliganj P.S. Case No. 137 of 2020 registered for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 504, 596 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶19

Taking into consideration the nature of allegation and the injuries caused, which are simple in nature, I am inclined to

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64489 of 2021(2) dt.23-02-2022 2/3

¶21

grant benefit of anticipatory bail to the above named petitioners and in the event of arrest they shall be released on bail, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. as well as the following conditions:-

¶22

The above named applicants, furnish personal bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand only) each with their recent self-attested photograph and surety of the like amount on the following conditions at the satisfaction of the investigating officer.

¶23

The applicants shall cooperate with the investigation and make themselves available for interrogation whenever required.

¶24

The applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any witness acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer,

¶25

The applicants shall not obstruct or hamper the police investigation and not to play mischief with the evidence collected or yet to be collected by the police;

¶26

The applicants shall not leave the territory of Nawada (District name) without prior permission of the court, till trial is over;

¶27

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64489 of 2021(2) dt.23-02-2022 3/3

¶28

The applicants shall maintain law and order;

¶29

The applicants shall, at the time of execution of the

¶30

bond, furnish their address and mobile number to the investigating officer, and the court concerned, and shall not change the residence till the final disposal of the case;

¶31

The applicants shall surrender their passport, if any, before the investigating officer within a week and, if they does not possess any passport, they shall file an affidavit to that effect before the investigating officer;

¶32

The applicants shall regularly remain present during the trial and cooperate with the Hon’ble court to complete the trial for the above offences.

¶33

(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J)

¶34

pravinkumar/-

¶35

U T

Deonandan Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deonandan Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay Mandal, Vs The State of Bihar

Sushil Ram @ Sushil Kumar Ram, Vs The State of Bihar

Gupta Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Anil Singh @ Anil Sharma Vs the State of Bihar

Devendra Kumar Singh @ Chunnu Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Ramesh Mandal Vs The State of Bihar