Allowed

Satrughan Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC5 Sept 2022CR. MISC./6126/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment grants anticipatory bail to petitioners in a murder case involving Sections 323, 341, 307 IPC and Arms Act. The court ordered surrender within four weeks for enlargement on bail subject to sureties and conditions. Section 438(2) CrPC was applied.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners to surrender to Court below within four weeks to be enlarged on bail with bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties.

Satrughan Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6126 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-33 Year-2018 Thana- BIHARIGANJ District- Madhepura

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SATRUGHAN YADAV S/o Late Laxmi Yadav Resident of Village - Kushthan, P.S.- Bihariganj, District - Madhepura.

¶5

S.P. Kumar @ Anuj Kumar S/o Late Bhushan Yadav Resident of Village - Kushthan, P.S.- Bihariganj, District - Madhepura.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Patla Kumari For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Rabindra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

4 05-09-2022

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

¶13

learned APP for the State.

¶14

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Bihariganj P.S. Case no. 33 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Sections 323, 341, 307, 120(B), 504, 506, 34 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code and section 23 of the Arms Act.

¶15

It is a case of commission of murder of the informant’s father namely, Siyaram Yadav by the petitioners along with other co-accused petitioners.

¶16

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have committed

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6126 of 2022(4) dt.05-09-2022 2/2

¶18

no offence. On the order of co-accused Bhusan Yadav, Abhay Kumar Yadav has opened fire which hit informant’s father and he died. Specific allegation of firing is against Abhay Kumar Yadav and not the petitioner. General and omnibus allegations have been levelled against the petitioners. Similarly, situated other co-accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail vide order dated 22.07.2019, in Cr. Misc. No. 17118 of 2019.

¶19

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Bihariganj P.S. Case no. 33 of 2018, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-I class Udakishunganj subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶20

sushma/Aman

¶21

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶22

Satrughan Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satrughan Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mister Chauhan Vs The State of Bihar

Rajiv Kumar @ Birendra Kumar Vidyarthi Vs The State of Bihar

Rafik @ Md. Rafik Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Devi Soren Vs The State of Bihar

Mintu Kuar @ Mintu Kumar Gupta @ Mintu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Akash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar