Ram Shobhit Yadav v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Patna addressed a bail application under Section 438 CrPC. The petitioner, alleged owner of a vehicle containing seized liquor, argued he was falsely roped in. The court rejected the bail prayer, finding the huge quantity involved made it inapt for bail at this stage.
What did the court decide?
Prayer for regular bail rejected; petitioner invited to renew prayer after framing of charges.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6048 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4 Year-2022 Thana- RAHIKA District- Madhubani
======================================================
RAM SHOBHIT YADAV Son of Nathuni Yadav Resident of VillageKorahiya, Ward No. 10, P.S.- Jaynagar, District- Madhubani.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
3 22-06-2022
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ravi Prakash For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER
... ... Opposite Party/s
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
Petitioner seeks regular bail in Rahika P.S. Case no.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail in a case involving possession of alleged Nepali liquor in a van he claimed ownership of.
Whether the alleged circumstances justify granting bail at the present stage of the proceedings.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ram Shobhit Yadav
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
Shaileendra Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court