The High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner regarding alleged offences under sections 302, 120(B)/34 IPC and Arms Act, conditional upon removing stamp defects and furnishing a bond with sureties.
Anticipatory bail granted subject to removing defects, appearing within four weeks, and furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6020 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-696 Year-2018 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR TOWN DistrictMuzaffarpur
======================================================
RAJU TURHA @ RAJU SAH Son of Late Lalbabu Sah Resident of MohallaKalyani Near Dinanath Hotel, P.S-Town, District-Muzaffarpur, Bihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Prabhat Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nagendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
4 11-05-2022
Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Muzaffarpur Town P.S. Case No. 696 of 2018, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
FIR has been registered against unknown persons and the name of the present petitioner was figured in the confessional statement of co-accused Sushil Kumar Chhaparia and Shyamnandan Mishra who have been granted regular bail by the coordinate Bench of this Court.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6020 of 2020(4) dt.11-05-2022 2/2
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that on similar ground co-accused Ashutosh Kumar @ Ashutosh Kumar Shahi was granted anticipatory bail by the coordinate Bench vide order dated 29.11.2019 in Cr. Misc No. 71355 of 2019. Similarly coaccused Pradyuman Kumar Sharma @ Mantu Sharma was also granted anticipatory bail by the coordinate bench vide order dated 04.02.2020 in Cr. Misc No. 70341 of 2019 and the case of the present petitioner is on similar footing.
Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances as well as the fact that on similar footing co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail by the coordinate Bench, let the petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks before the learned court below, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur in connection with Town P.S. Case No. 696 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided in para-1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner in connection with the pending case?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Raju Turha @ Raju Sah
The State of Bihar
Nawneet Kumar Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
