Santosh Kumar Sah @ Santosh Sah v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application was granted. The application was subsequently dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57295 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-260 Year-2020 Thana- LAXMIPUR District- Jamui
======================================================
SANTOSH KUMAR SAH @ SANTOSH SAH S/o Bhuneshwar Sah Resident of Village - Karra, Police Station - Laxmipur, District - Jamui.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amrendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Rita Verma, A.P.P. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER
3 10-10-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
A.P.P. for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner after some arguments seeks permission to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application
is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
gauravkr/-
U T
SANTOSH KUMAR SAH @ SANTOSH SAH
The State of Bihar
Satyavrat Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court