Allowed

Umesh Kumar @ Umesh Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC20 Dec 2022CR. MISC./56031/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to petitioners in a criminal case involving offences under Section 307 IPC, subject to furnishing bail bonds and appearing before the Judicial Magistrate within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners granted bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount to appear before the Judicial Magistrate within six weeks.

Umesh Kumar @ Umesh Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56031 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-352 Year-2022 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

UMESH KUMAR @ UMESH SINGH Son of Late Sitaram Singh R/VRasalpur, P.S- Muffasil, Dist- Gaya

¶5

Nirmal Singh Son of Baburam Singh R/V- Rasalpur, P.S- Muffasil, DistGaya

¶6

Mantu Kumar @ Mantu Singh Son of Ramjee Singh @ Ramji Singh R/VRasalpur, P.S- Muffasil, Dist- Gaya

¶7

Rishi Kumar @ Niraj Kumar Singh Son of Late Umesh Kumar R/VRasalpur, P.S- Muffasil, Dist- Gaya

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶12

======================================================

¶13

Appearance :

¶14

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rabindra Kumar Priyadarshi For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Rajeev Nayan App, 231

¶15

======================================================

¶16

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶17

2 20-12-2022 Heard both sides.

¶18

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Muffasil (Gaya) P.S. Case No.352 of 2022, registered for the offences punishable under Section 307 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. It is submitted that the petitioner no.1 has got one criminal antecedent whereas rest of the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as stated in paragraph-3 of the bail

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56031 of 2022(2) dt.20-12-2022 2/2

¶21

application. It is further submitted that similarly situated coaccused has already been enlarged on anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 28.11.2022, passed in Cr. Misc. No.42301 of 2022.

¶22

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

¶23

Considering the fact that similarly situated co-accused person has already been enlarged on anticipatory bail by this Court, let petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Gaya in connection with Muffasil (Gaya) P.S. Case No.352 of 2022, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶24

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶25

Sanjay/-

¶26

U T

Umesh Kumar @ Umesh Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Umesh Kumar @ Umesh Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nitu Kumari @ Neetu Kumari Vs the State of Bihar

Anis Kumar @ Anish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Suraj Kumar Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Kumar @ Vikesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rajesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Imran Zaki @ Banty Vs the State of Bihar