Allowed

Mukesh Ray v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC25 Jul 2022CR. MISC./55715/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners in a bail application arising from offences under various IPC sections, directing them to remove defects within four weeks and ensuring verification of criminal antecedents by the lower court.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail within six weeks of arrest or surrender, subject to verifying criminal antecedents and furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000 each with two sureties.

Mukesh Ray Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55715 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-186 Year-2020 Thana- AURAI District- Muzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MUKESH RAY Son of Yogendra Ray Resident of Village - Abhimanpur Chahunta, P.S. - Aurai, District - Muzaffarpur.

¶5

Nand Kishore Ray @ Nandu Ray Son of Yogendra Ray Resident of Village - Abhimanpur Chahunta, P.S. - Aurai, District - Muzaffarpur.

¶6

Subodh Ray Son of Yogendra Ray Resident of Village - Abhimanpur Chahunta, P.S. - Aurai, District - Muzaffarpur.

¶7

Vinod Ray Son of Yogendra Ray Resident of Village - Abhimanpur Chahunta, P.S. - Aurai, District - Muzaffarpur.

¶8

Manoj Ray Son of Yogendra Ray Resident of Village - Abhimanpur Chahunta, P.S. - Aurai, District - Muzaffarpur.

¶9

Ganesh Ray S/O Baidyanath Ray Resident of Village - Abhimanpur Chahunta, P.S. - Aurai, District - Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶14

======================================================

¶15

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Chandra Shekhar Anand, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Vinod Shanker Modi, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶16

4 25-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶17

Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceedings. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within stipulated period, office will place the matter before the Bench.

¶19

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506,

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55715 of 2021(4) dt.25-07-2022 2/3

¶21

354(B), 307, 379, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶22

Allegedly, the informant and his mother with an intention to kill have been assaulted by the FIR named accused persons including the petitioners by means of various weapons.

¶23

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case due to prior enmity. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation leveled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. It is submitted that for the alleged occurrence, there is a case and counter-case between the parties and both sides have sustained injuries, which are simple in nature. There is a previous enmity between the parties. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

¶24

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶25

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering that there is a case and counter case between the parties, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each

¶26

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55715 of 2021(4) dt.25-07-2022 3/3

¶27

with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Aurai P.S. Case No.186 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶28

However, learned court below is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners before accepting the bail bonds. In case, it is found that there is antecedent against any of the petitioner(s), his bail bond shall not be accepted.

¶29

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶30

pallavi/-

¶31

U T

Mukesh Ray v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mukesh Ray v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Karka @ Prahlad Mandal Vs the State of Bihar

Rakesh Kumar Paswan @ Rakesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Lal Babu Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Asif @ Md. Asique @ Asique Vs the State of Bihar

Hemant Kumar @ Sonu Kumar @ Raushan Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Om Prakash Mahto @ Om Prakash Mandal Vs The State of Bihar