The Patna High Court allowed a restoration application for Criminal Appeal No. 59 of 2018, which had been dismissed due to non-compliance with a peremptory order, thereby restoring the appeal to its original file.
Restoration of Criminal Appeal No. 59 of 2018 to its original file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55506 of 2021 In
CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No.59 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-23 Year-1997 Thana- SHIVSAGAR District- Rohtas
======================================================
Shiva Nand Bind, aged about 52 years (Male), S/o Baban Bind, R/o villageBilaspur, P.S.- Chenari, District- Rohtas.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajani Kant Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH)
3 03-11-2022
The present application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for restoration of Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 59 of 2018 which was dismissed on 12.03.2019 due to non-compliance of per-emptory order dated 26.02.2019, passed by the then Coordinate Bench of this Court.
On the grounds mentioned in the restoration application, Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 59 of 2018 is restored to its original file.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55506 of 2021(3) dt.03-11-2022 2/2
Accordingly, the present restoration application is
allowed.
(Sudhir Singh, J)
U.K./- U T
( Shailendra Singh, J)
Shiva Nand Bind
Sudhir Singh
Shailendra Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
