Allowed

Shadab @ Shadab Alam v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC12 Apr 2022CR. MISC./52667/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an oral order on a bail application, the Patna High Court allowed bail to the petitioner in a robbery case under Section 392 IPC, subject to conditions including furnishing a bond, having a family member as a surety, appearing for trial, and reporting to police monthly for six months.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on a bond of Rs. 10,000/- along with two sureties of like amount.

Shadab @ Shadab Alam Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52667 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-100 Year-2019 Thana- DIGHALBANK District- Kishanganj

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SHADAB @ SHADAB ALAM Son of Nurul Huda @ Nurul Hoda Resident of Mohalla - LRP, Bahadurganj LRP, P.S.- Bahadurganj, District - Kishanganj.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Diwakar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chandra Sen Prasad Singh, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 12-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶13

The petitioner is in jail in connection with Dighalbank P.S. Case No. 100 of 2019 lodged on 26.11.2019 under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

As per the prosecution case, the informant was working as a Door Help Banking Officer in Bandhan Bank, Tulsiya and after collecting Rs. 2,07, 435/- from the Female Self Help Group while he was on way back to deposit the amount in the bank, the four accused persons in two motorcycles hit his motorcycle and later snatched the amount along with his mobile.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is innocent and merely on the basis of confessional statement he has been implicated as an accused for which he is already in judicial custody since 15.10.2020 (as incorporated in paragraph-

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52667 of 2021(3) dt.12-04-2022 2/3

¶17

13 of the bail application) as also in Cr. Misc. No. 57038 of 2021 one of the accused Mukarram @ Mukrram has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 11.04.2022.

¶18

Considering the aforesaid facts as also that the charge sheet has already been submitted in the case, the Court deems it fit to enlarge the petitioner on bail subject to imposition of conditions in view of the fact that he has criminal antecedent (as disclosed in paragraph-3 of the bail application).

¶19

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj in connection with Dighalbank P.S. Case No. 100 of 2019, subject to the following conditions :-

¶20

(i) one of the bailor should be the family member of the petitioner, who shall provide official document to show his/her bona fide;

¶21

(ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reasons will entail his cancellation of bail by the Trial Court itself;

¶22

(iii) he shall appear before the concerned police

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52667 of 2021(3) dt.12-04-2022 3/3

¶24

station every month for next six months to mark his presence;

¶25

(iv) the petitioner shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.

¶26

The bail application is allowed with the aforesaid

observations.

(Rajiv Roy, J)

Jagdish/-

U T

Shadab @ Shadab Alam v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shadab @ Shadab Alam v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ghyanchandra Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Chhote Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Chand @ Md. Irfan Vs the State of Bihar

Kishun Mukhiya Vs The State of Bihar

Rupesh Kumar Jha Vs The State of Bihar

Manish Kumar Vs the State of Bihar