Petitioner sought permission to withdraw Criminal Miscellaneous application after being acquitted; permission was granted and the application dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the application was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51550 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-65 Year-2021 Thana- JALALGARH District- Purnia
======================================================
Roushani Devi W/O Shri Avinash Kumar R/O Village-Barbanna, P.SRaniganj, District-Araria.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
3 19-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during pendency of this application, the petitioner has been acquitted and, as such, the matter has become infructuous, he seeks permission to withdraw the present application.
The permission is accorded.
This application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Harish Kumar, J)
Shakir/- U T
Roushani Devi W/O Shri Avinash Kumar
The State of Bihar
Harish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
