Dismissed

Arbind Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC27 Apr 2022CR. MISC./50861/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous matter arising from an NCB case involving the recovery of 1400.200 kg of Ganja, the petitioner sought regular bail. The learned Single Judge, noting the serious nature of the accusation and the involvement in the vehicle carrying the contraband, refused the bail application.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for bail is rejected. No privilege of bail is granted.

Arbind Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50861 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-7 Year-2020 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Arbind Kumar, S/o Doman Ray, R/V - Saidabad (Mohanpur), P.S.- Raghopur, Distt. - Vaishali.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Kumari Sujata Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bharat Lal, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶8

3 27-04-2022

¶9

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶11

The petitioner seeks regular bail, who is in custody in connection with NCB Crime Case No. 07 of 2020, giving rise to Special Case No. 103 of 2020, for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c) read with 20 (b)(ii)(c) and 29 of the NDPS Act, 1985.

¶12

As per prosecution case, it is alleged that on 16.07.2020, a team of Narcotic Control Bureau, Patna, on secret information intercepted a Truck bearing registration no. HR 46C

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50861 of 2021(3) dt.27-04-2022 2/3

¶14

On search total 1400.200 Kg. of Ganja has been recovered. This petitioner (Arbind Kumar) and one Naeb Singh were arrested from the said truck.

¶15

It is submitted on behalf of learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and in fact he was a daily wager and was accompanied with the driver only in order to load and unload the articles/ materials loaded on the truck and he has no concern with the alleged recovered materials. It is also submitted that the petitioner is in jail custody since 17.07.2020 and charge-sheet has been submitted in this case.

¶16

On the other hand, learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the bail application and submits that a huge quantity i.e. 1400.200 kg of Ganja has been recovered from the truck of which the petitioner is said to be the Khalasi/cleaner and no leniency can be granted.

¶17

Having considered the submissions made on behalf of the parties and taking into consideration the serious nature of accusation and huge recovery of Ganja from the truck of which the petitioner was said to be the Khalasi/cleaner, this Court is not inclined to grant privilege of bail to the petitioner.

¶18

Accordingly, the prayer for bail is rejected.

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50861 of 2021(3) dt.27-04-2022 3/3

¶20

It is expected that the learned trial court will expedite

¶21

the trial.

¶22

(Harish Kumar, J)

¶23

uday/-

¶24

U T

Arbind Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arbind Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Parwej Alam Vs the State of Bihar

Janardan Prasad Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Ramakant Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Vivek Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Rajiv Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kunal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar