Allowed

Ritu Raj Singh v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC20 Apr 2022CR. MISC./5079/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants regular bail to the petitioner in a prohibition case involving liquor recovery. The court noted the petitioner's lack of connection to the seized vehicle, five months' custody without prior record, and submission of the charge sheet as grounds for release upon furnishing a bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Enlargement on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each before the Exclusive Special Judge.

Ritu Raj Singh Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5079 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-393 Year-2017 Thana- KHAJANCHI HAT District- Purnia

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RITU RAJ SINGH S/o- INDRADEO SINGH Resident of Village- Basgaraha (Chhoti Parmanandpur), Gerabari, P.S.- Korha, Distt.- Katihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pawan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur, APP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 20-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶13

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant

¶14

of regular bail in a case registered under sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶15

As per the prosecution case, on search being conducted 109.5 litres of liquor was recovered from a pick-up van and the petitioner was taken into custody.

¶16

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. He has no concern with the seized liquor nor with the vehicle in question. He is in custody since 11.11.2021 and has no criminal antecedent.

¶17

Heard learned APP for the State.

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5079 of 2022(2) dt.20-04-2022 2/2

¶19

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, the petitioner having no concern with the pick-up van, having remained in custody for more than 5 months, not having any criminal antecedent and charge sheet having been submitted in the case, the Court directs the petitioner to be enlarged on bail in connection with Spl (Excise) Case no. 1624 of 2017 (arising out of K.Hat (Maranga) P.S. Case no. 393 of 2017) on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special (Excise) Judge I, Purnea.

¶20

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶21

Prakash/-

¶22

Ritu Raj Singh v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ritu Raj Singh v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dharmbir Singh @ Bablu Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjit Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Kabita Devi @ Kavita Devi @ Kabita @ Kavita Rani Vs The State of Bihar

Rajan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Shivji Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Faiyaz Alam @ Faiyaz Vs The State of Bihar