Allowed

Sushil Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC25 Mar 2022CR. MISC./50446/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single Judge of the Patna High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner, who was arrested for smuggling illicit liquor, noting he was neither the owner nor driver of the vehicle and no liquor was recovered from his personal possession.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on regular bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of the like amount to the Special Judge, Excise, Aurangabad.

Sushil Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Patna HC (2022) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50446 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-31 Year-2021 Thana- MADANPUR District- Aurangabad

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SUSHIL KUMAR S/o Ramashish Yadav Resident of Village- Chiraiyatand, P.S.- Madanpur, District- Aurangabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishan Prasad Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr.Bhaskar Shankar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Akshay Lal Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 25-03-2022

¶11

Heard the parties.

¶12

Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with General Registration No. 154 / 2021 arising out of Madanpur PS Case No. 31 of 2021 registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.

¶13

Police got secret information that petitioner along with other accused persons have brought consignment of illicit liquor through a truck, proceeded towards the place of occurrence and recovered 5180 liters spirit from the truck which was parked on the road.

¶14

Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in this case on the basis of alleged information from

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50446 of 2021(2) dt.25-03-2022 2/2

¶16

spy regarding consignment of liquor brought by the petitioner. He next submits that petitioner is neither the owner nor the driver of the truck and no illicit liquor has been recovered from conscious possession and / or vehicle belonging to the petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 16/5/2021.

¶17

Regard being had to the submissions made by the parties and taking into consideration the materials available on record, the fact that petitioner is not the owner nor the driver of the truck in question, no illicit liquor has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner, he is in custody since 165-2021 and charge sheet has already been submitted, as such, I am inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner.

¶18

Let the petitioner, above named, be released on regular bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20000/- ( twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge -II cum Special Judge, Excise, Aurangabad in connection with General Registration No. 154 / 2021 arising out of Madanpur PS Case No. 31 of 2021.

¶19

praful/-

¶20

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)

¶21

U T

Sushil Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sushil Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manoj Sah Vs the State of Bihar

Shanti Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Munna Patel Vs The State of Bihar

Munna Kumar Tanti Vs the State of Bihar

Begwa @ Ritesh Shah Vs The State of Bihar

Pappu Kumar Bhagat Vs The State of Bihar